On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:46:43AM +0100, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Juiceman <juiceman69 at gmail.com> [2006-11-16 20:53:08]:
> 
> > Could we get a new freenet-ext.jar built and uploaded pretty please?
> 
> It will be as soon as it's ready. I use to give links to pre-releases of
> it on irc to get feedback... So far :
>       1) the new BDB code seems to perform fine
>       2) the new wrapper code performs fine too
>       3) and the FEC code for x86_64 compiles but segfaults :| The C
>       tests are passing but even a simple testcase using JNI fails and
>       makes the JVM to segfault.
> 
> I'm still working on it. From my custom bechmarks, I would say that the
> native fec code is only twice faster than the pure java one (the C version is
> twice faster than the java test).

That's a bit disappointing... I thought the java plus JNI was half the
speed of the C version?
> 
> I'll keep you posted. I hope I'm not running into YetAnotherJVMBug,
> a x86_64 specific one.
> 
> > Also the 
> > http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-cvs-snapshot.jar.url
> > doesn't update anymore.  Is that by design?
> 
> No, I'll fix it. Some day we will have to break backward compatibility
> though :/

What he means is you really really should get a new update.sh/update.cmd
from downloads.freenetproject.org/update if your script is still using
the above url.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061117/160dc10e/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to