* toad <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2006-11-17 13:44:09]: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 09:46:43AM +0100, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * Juiceman <juiceman69 at gmail.com> [2006-11-16 20:53:08]: > > > > > Could we get a new freenet-ext.jar built and uploaded pretty please? > > > > It will be as soon as it's ready. I use to give links to pre-releases of > > it on irc to get feedback... So far : > > 1) the new BDB code seems to perform fine > > 2) the new wrapper code performs fine too > > 3) and the FEC code for x86_64 compiles but segfaults :| The C > > tests are passing but even a simple testcase using JNI fails and > > makes the JVM to segfault. > > > > I'm still working on it. From my custom bechmarks, I would say that the > > native fec code is only twice faster than the pure java one (the C version > > is > > twice faster than the java test). > > That's a bit disappointing... I thought the java plus JNI was half the > speed of the C version?
Hmm, that's what I told you yesterday on irc yes but in fact it's not the case: The JNI libs weren't loading at all and we were doing plain java computation. The JNI overhead seems to be negligeable when the library loads... compared to the C version. -- NextGen$. "On peut ob??r aux lois en souhaitant qu'elles changent, comme on sert ? la guerre en souhaitant la paix." Merleau Ponty - L'?loge de la philosophie -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20061117/6b603c93/attachment.pgp>
