On Friday 07 December 2007 23:24, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > This is an interesting way to tackle the problem. Might I suggest that instead of > doing this for data that we are about to discard we do it select a key from the DS > at random and reinsert if its far from our current location. > > One thing that may be happening that somewant offsets this problem could be > clustering of locations. e.g. even though my nodes location changes often it could > be that it favours some subsets of the total location space. It would be worthing > adding a metric to track how long a node spends in a given area of the location > space.
Agreed, a simple record of our last 100 locations and how long (uptime) we spent in each would be interesting. > > Ed -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071208/f07618a7/attachment.pgp>
