On Friday 21 December 2007 15:46, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Ouch ... does that mean we always timeout?! In fact, surely the > > below will NPE > > if sender == null? > > That's the way I read it! If this is correct, that means that all CHK > inserts in the past have been successful only on collision. That is: > (1) insert it, (2) timeout, (3) insert it again and see that it is > already there. > > If you see a NPE that I've introduced or fixed please be more > specific, I don't understand.
No, I misread it w.r.t. NPE. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071221/777092a7/attachment.pgp>
