On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:50:53AM +0000, Bob Ham wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:44 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > that would be a grand total of 64MB. > > Which IMHO is very reasonable. > > As noted, that's pretty massive. I don't think it's reasonable at all. > Here's some stats for comparable daemons that I quickly plucked out of a > "ps axu" on the box I'm running fred: > > named 3.17 MB > imapd 2.85 MB > mysqld 17.33 MB > apache2 7.82 MB > postgres 6.47 MB > fred 120.82 MB
Squid can use tons. So can a well-configured high load apache. > > Now, to me, fred is seeming a little out of place there. Even if it was > 64MB, that's still three times the size of mysql's footprint. So what? The typical low end new PC has 512MB of RAM. > > What, exactly, requires all this memory? > > Bob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070203/5ae48c30/attachment.pgp>
