On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 17:33 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:29:54AM +0000, Bob Ham wrote:
> > Yes, but the limits are still being wholly ignored. Which JVM would you > > suggest running fred with that will respect configured memory limits? > > > > > What was the limit set to? > > > > 196 MB > > > > > What was the usage reported in the log file > > > (Memory in use: <blah> - only enabled with minor logging)? > > > > Which log file; wrapper log or fred log? The statistics for the "java > > memory allocated" and "java memory used" come straight off of the > > statistics page of the web interface. > > And they exceeded 192MB? I have never seen this; what JVM? The statistics page didn't report greater than 196MB but greater than 196MB was used. > This is all taken from the web interface? Or are you using some external > tool? I assume "Count" is in megabytes? Different places; the java memory allocation and usage, and the store usage are all taken from the statistics page. I've attached the script used to collect the stats. I've also put up the data collection scripts and the plotting script here: http://teasel.6gnip.net/~rah/freenet-threads-2007-01-21-23-37.tar.bz2 There shouldn't be any problems with access now. Bob -- Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: freenet-threads Type: application/x-shellscript Size: 2011 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070203/dce469c1/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070203/dce469c1/attachment.pgp>
