On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:39:53PM +0100, Jerome Flesch wrote:
> Ok, but why a new command ? Why not just another error code ? (xx =
> cancelled by user ; yy = cancelled and removed by user)
>
> Anyway, as long as the GetFailed command is still sent, it won't break
> my implementation. I'm just asking that by curiosity.
Well, just because it's cancelled doesn't necessarily mean it's removed.
>
>
> 2007/2/2, bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com>:
> > imho cancel means both: request stopped for now, or request removed.
> > Due to extendability of the protocol the parameters should be clear,
> > so the answer for a RemovePersistentRequest should be something with
> > the word "removed", same as requested. We should not start to
> > introduce such ambiguities in the early state of 0.7.
> >
> > On 2/2/07, Jerome Flesch <jflesch at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Since there is no cancel command in FCP, I don't see what "cancelled
> > > by user" can mean except that the user removed it ?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/2/2, bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com>:
> > > > Toad wrote:
> > > > > GetFailed reason=Cancelled ? Admittedly this doesn't tell you for
> > > > > certain that it has been removed... Hmm...
> > > >
> > > > So either a new message, or a new parameter reason=Removed would give
> > > > a clear statement that the request was removed. Whereas the new
> > > > message makes it easier for clients to handle the removed request,
> > > > otherwise you have to do all inside the handler for GetFailed. My 2
> > > > cents....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/2/07, bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Did you follow the thread on tech yesterday? Thats why I added a new
> > > > > msg....no problem to change it again.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/2/07, Jerome Flesch <jflesch at nerim.net> wrote:
> > > > > > "new message PersistentRequestRemoved" ? I'm a little bit curious
> > > > > > about this new message:
> > > > > > Wasn't the node supposed to send a GetFailed ("cancelled by user")
> > > > > > when a request was removed ? If yes, what is the goal of this new
> > > > > > message ?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070203/52a7427e/attachment.pgp>
