* bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com> [2007-02-03 19:23:17]:
> Yeah this is the 3rd possibility *g*. Who will decide this now? > > > On 2/3/07, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:50:51PM +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > > > I answered to this in my mail from 2:15pm. It was only my idea to add > > > a new message because _I_ thought it is easier for clients this way. > > > It is no problem to change the GetFailed message and to provide a > > > "reason=removed" to the client. > > > > Or a Removed=true|false flag. I would be in favor of the flag solution.
