Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05 > 16:30:39]: > >> Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: >> >> > * Jano <alejandro at mosteo.com> [2007-02-05 >> > 15:46:09]: >> > >> >> Jano wrote: >> >> >> >> > I'm going to test now a standard 128m node with no insertions nor >> >> > clients running... >> >> >> >> (Actually what I have done is to put all my inserts in "will never >> >> finish". Should this cease all local insertion activity, Toad?) >> > >> > No. >> >> Well, then I'll remove my inserts. But how is then interpreted this >> priority setting? "Will be processed iif there's nothing else going on?" > > It depends on the scheduler policy you've choosen. If you are using the > default (HARD) then yes.
Ok. A basic question in this leak hunt: is the insertion process designed to use constant (or, rather, upper bounded) memory per insertion?
