On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:44:30AM -0500, Chris Carlin wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Interesting. Somebody needs to talk to the BDB folk, to get an idea what > > is a reasonable footprint. > > What, at this point, are the questions on the table? In my casual > skimming of the threads under this subject it seems to have gotten > rather muddled. I'd be happy to bring the questions to them if I knew > what they were...
Why does BDB use 54MB+ when we tell it to use 20MB? What is a realistic minimum footprint, and how does it relate to the number of tables in use, their size etc? > > ~Chris
