On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:47:30PM +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > > Imho, I think the solution of Toad has one advantage: I will probably > > keep the implementation on the node side simpler. The simpler it will > > be, the less bug there will be (but I'm not a node dev, so I may be > > wrong). > > Don't worry to much about the node code, the one solution is as simple > as the other one (I will implement it). This should not be the base > for the decision, only the simplicity of the protocol!
Agreed. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070207/22f4b273/attachment.pgp>
