On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:49:49PM +0100, bo-le at web.de wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2007 22:51 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:01:52PM +0100, bo-le at web.de wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 23:57 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > > > 10,000 lines? Maybe with a big freesite insert? > > > > > > yes, the freenet svn as freentsvn-site will hit this easyly > > > > Okay, but will that change priority frequently? > yes. The plan for freenetsvn: > The files itselfs are inserted normal (chk, prio 3) and the freenetsvn > metadata insert (ssk) starts at prio=0 and is switched back to 3 if the node > reports PutFetchable.
Why? Wouldn't it be better to allow the files to be auto-bundled into containers? (Not that that works properly right now...) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070209/b93f0a7a/attachment.pgp>
