On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * highfly joe <highfly22 at gmail.com> [2006-12-25 18:50:40]: > > > Hi, > > To control spam, there must be some operationes to control file inserted. So > > some trusted servers are configured to sign off every sane files. And only > > the trusted servers hold a certain private key and release the public key to > > normal user. There are different kinds of trusted servers, which can > > constitute different domains, which contain different topics. Every file > > wanted to be inserted into a domain need request the trusted server to be > > signed by the private key. Every node can be configure to be interesting in > > several domains by user. So what you stored in your machine is what your > > wanted. This mechanism like SSK. But there are one major difference between > > them: > > to allow other people insert a SSK file, the private key must be given to > > them,. but if use the trusted servers, the only information exchanged is the > > signature. > > > > The trusted servers can permit such essay to publish or not. And it's not > > going to be another censor. Cause you can build your own domain to fight > > back. The user can choose which is most important thing on their own will. > > > > Regards, > > Haiwei > > Hi, > > Your idea has been discussed on the public frost board "hereticnet"... > I suggest you join the debate there :) So far the conclusion is : "manual > moderation would introduce insane latencies".
It has? That's not what Hereticnet is about... > > NextGen$ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070115/00a31e08/attachment.pgp>
