* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2007-01-15 15:53:55]:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > * highfly joe <highfly22 at gmail.com> [2006-12-25 18:50:40]: > > > > > Hi, > > > To control spam, there must be some operationes to control file inserted. > > > So > > > some trusted servers are configured to sign off every sane files. And only > > > the trusted servers hold a certain private key and release the public key > > > to > > > normal user. There are different kinds of trusted servers, which can > > > constitute different domains, which contain different topics. Every file > > > wanted to be inserted into a domain need request the trusted server to be > > > signed by the private key. Every node can be configure to be interesting > > > in > > > several domains by user. So what you stored in your machine is what your > > > wanted. This mechanism like SSK. But there are one major difference > > > between > > > them: > > > to allow other people insert a SSK file, the private key must be given to > > > them,. but if use the trusted servers, the only information exchanged is > > > the > > > signature. > > > > > > The trusted servers can permit such essay to publish or not. And it's not > > > going to be another censor. Cause you can build your own domain to fight > > > back. The user can choose which is most important thing on their own will. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Haiwei > > > > Hi, > > > > Your idea has been discussed on the public frost board "hereticnet"... > > I suggest you join the debate there :) So far the conclusion is : "manual > > moderation would introduce insane latencies". > > It has? That's not what Hereticnet is about... I know ... and yes, I've seen the same proposal on that board a while ago. NextGen$
