Nonetheless the general thrust of Jusa's argument was that there is no point 
having darknet. He's wrong. Opennet is a means to an end, not the be all and 
end all.

On Thursday 07 June 2007 22:34, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Florent Daigni?re <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote:
> > * Jusa Saari <jargonautti at hotmail.com> [2007-06-07 23:23:48]:
> > Implementing a workaround (opennet, backtracking, ...) is only a way of
> > fixing temporarily the topology to the expense of both liberty (it has
> > to be the default behaviour as you pointed out) and safety (everyone
> > knows that the opennet approach has design caveats).
> >
> > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"
> > -- Benjamin Franklin
>
> Your use of the Franklin quote suggests that you are looking at this
> backwards.
>
> The alternative here is not between users using an opennet or a
> darknet, its between them using an opennet, or another solution that
> is far worse (such as a public proxy).  This is the simple reality of
> the situation that we see time and time again whenever we bother to
> listen to our users.
>
> Consequently, by giving people the option of an opennet, we aren't
> inviting them to give up liberty, we are inviting them to increase it.
>
> Most sane people think teenagers should have access to condoms, but
> some people think its a bad idea, claiming that giving teenagers
> access to condoms will encourage them to have sex.  The point,
> obviously, is that teenagers will have sex anyway, the only question
> is whether it will be safe sex.
>
> Substitute opennet for condoms, and darknet for abstinence, and you
> see that many of those arguing against opennet are following the exact
> same wrongheaded line of reasoning as those that disagree with
> allowing teenagers access to condoms.
>
> Ian.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070608/389709ee/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to