On Friday 08 June 2007 21:06, Jusa Saari wrote:
> > Your point is that without a critical mass, Freenet is of limited
> > usefulness- It's hard to FIND friends who use Freenet, which makes a
> > global darknet difficult. This is also true.
>
> Of course, in order for you to have at least three friends (the minimum
> number of connections to get an actual network and not just a
> 1-dimensional node chain) out of your ten closest ones (tell to less close
> friends you're running Freenet, and you're essentially running a public
> node) about 3/10 of the population needs to be running Freenet. Somehow, I
> doubt this is going to happen, even if the figure is adjusted for things
> like people selecting like-minded friends.

Not true. There is absolutely nothing wrong with connecting to casual 
acquaintances. It will produce the correct topology, and it's much less 
dangerous than true opennet or #freenet-refs .

> > I don't know that having this same discussion over and over will being up
> > and new data, or sway anyone ;)
>
> Yes, you are likely to be correct. Unfortunately, this means that Freenet
> will remain in obscurity with insignificant amount of users, since very
> few people will jump through the hoops to get it up and running - and even
> less people will spend the time to maintain it (by getting new connections
> as the old ones go down), especially given the very limited content at the
> time (mostly caused by those same insignificant user counts).

Agreed with the first poster. However the tradeoff isn't that terrible - 
slightly more work for a much better initial connection, and if anyone you 
know IS on freenet already, big gains.

> Oh well, I guess it's better this way; we wouldn't want various oppressive
> regimens to think Freenet an actual threat to themselves and put a horse's
> head into Matthew's bed, now would we ?-)

We have good reason to believe that China has blocked Freenet 0.5's session 
bytes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070608/3830410c/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to