> Locations are swapped on 0.7, fairly frequently. I am aware of that, but I won't analyze theoretically the implication of this. I will start with a stable Network which fullfills the Small World Topology.
> Right, in darknet Sybil isn't an issue unless people are stupid, no? This will be one of the questions to be answered, however this is already one of the more difficult ones. What happens if not you are stupid, but your neighbors. If you have a ring-topology you can answer this quite easily. other topologies will be much more difficult. Maybe I can answer that after formalizing the network behaviour. > > However also in Darknet its possible to do Sybilattacks, one trusted link to > > a "Sybil" is enough... however this leads to Network parts not very good > > connected to the rest. This leads to some ideas to prevent this. > I don't understand. Sybil = creating lots of bogus identities. Yes > The most you can do on darknet is get a small number of connections to a small > number of nodes and then pretend to be a much larger number of nodes - > which isn't a big deal. For swapping this will be a big deal, this will also be a big deal for the keyspace they will have under their control. Thomas
