On Wednesday 31 October 2007 08:58, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > From the Frost "freenet" board: > > ----- Anonymous ----- 2007.10.28 - 18:12:54GMT ----- > > Is it planned to expose some basic cryptographic functions through FCP > so that client authors can make use of them? I'm thinking of things > such as creating public/private keys, and signing and encrypting data > with those keys. > > ----- > > I think that's a pretty good idea. The node already handles all that > crypto stuff and client applications, plugins, whatever, wouldn't have > to bundle BouncyCastle (or similar libraries).
What's your response to the rest of the thread on Frost? They mentioned 1010, they mentioned gpg...? > > > Bombe > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071113/74f5a318/attachment.pgp>
