* David ???Bombe??? Roden <bombe at pterodactylus.net> [2007-10-31 18:34:20]:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:31 +0100, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > > I don't... Keep in mind that FCP is insecure by design... > > Now you're the second person reminding me of that. Please, PLEASE tell > why an FCP client should be allowed to request illegal material but not > to create a new key pair? That's what the GenerateSSK message is for. > Or sign a message with a previously generated > key? > > I'm seriously wondering what people think I am suggesting here. Maybe > you can elaborate on that. Will elaborate replying to Zothar :) NextGen$ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071031/f81657ec/attachment.pgp>
