On Tuesday 30 October 2007 11:52, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 07:23 -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > Is there some reason we cannot have the plugins on freenet itself. > > IMHO this would be an optimal solution. > > Absolutely. We also already thought of supplying the list of "official" > plugins via Freenet but we'd first need to implement Revokable Subspace > Keys.
Not really, we could and should reuse the existing auto-updater infrastructure (freenet.node.updater). > > Loading single plugins via Freenet will probably be implemented a lot > sooner, though. :) > > > > Ed > > Bombe > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071031/97d58930/attachment.pgp>
