On Wednesday 31 October 2007 01:52, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 30 October 2007 11:52, David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 07:23 -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > > > Is there some reason we cannot have the plugins on freenet itself. > > > IMHO this would be an optimal solution. > > > > Absolutely. We also already thought of supplying the list of "official" > > plugins via Freenet but we'd first need to implement Revokable Subspace > > Keys. > > Not really, we could and should reuse the existing auto-updater infrastructure > (freenet.node.updater).
One prerequisite would be explicit versioning of plugins. > > > > Loading single plugins via Freenet will probably be implemented a lot > > sooner, though. :) > > > > > > > Ed > > > > Bombe > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071031/f3b133d6/attachment.pgp>
