On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:31 +0100, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> I don't... Keep in mind that FCP is insecure by design...
Now you're the second person reminding me of that. Please, PLEASE tell
why an FCP client should be allowed to request illegal material but not
to create a new key pair? Or sign a message with a previously generated
key?
I'm seriously wondering what people think I am suggesting here. Maybe
you can elaborate on that.
Bombe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071031/ab627741/attachment.pgp>
