On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Florent Daigni?re <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > * Daniel Cheng <j16sdiz+freenet at gmail.com> [2008-08-11 23:07:43]: > >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:39 PM, <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: >> > Author: nextgens >> > Date: 2008-08-11 14:39:46 +0000 (Mon, 11 Aug 2008) >> > New Revision: 21748 >> > >> > Modified: >> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java >> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeIPDetector.java >> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/pluginmanager/PluginInfoWrapper.java >> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/pluginmanager/PluginManager.java >> > Log: >> > Skip the bandwidth limiting step in the wizard if the node has detected a >> > recent enough, and working UPnP plugin >> > >> >> My router never give the correct bandwidth via UPnP interface. >> It's better to just select the detected bandwidth as default, not >> skipping the step. >> > > Heh, I didn't want to implement that up&p crap... but toad pushed > hard on me to do so... and so far the answer has always been: assume that > it works as expected; even if it works in 5% of the cases that's good > enough to be worth implementing. > > Out of curiosity, what does it report? (you can see it if you visit the > plugin's page via fproxy). The spec says that if not implemented it > should return a negative value. >
It was returning the correct value.. Sorry for noise. > NextGen$ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkigYLgACgkQU/Z/dHFfxtc9uQCeInyPN0L88VS7BMWin3nfgzZ/ > fG8AoPLB68UbklEx1T4KvydIbo7HK9f7 > =/w5m > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
