On Tuesday 29 July 2008 09:36, Jano wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > (...) > > > > We should probably show the standard GPL thingy... > > Just yesterday I saw some comments on GPL, and someone argued that, since the > GPL requests nothing of the end user, there is little point into showing it > during installs as if it were some EULA. I tend to agree; if it's clear enough > to developers that they're dealing with GPL code, that should be enough. > Regular users can get some simple text as "open source, free of charge, as-is, > check license if you intend to develop".
Nonetheless, we should display the NO WARRANTY boilerplate somewhere. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080729/c154aa28/attachment.pgp>
