Matthew Toseland wrote: >> and privacy and convenience on the >> other (convenience because Freenet's quite a large app to have running in >> the background if you're not the person who installed it). > > It shouldn't be. We're working on that.
No matter how much you slim it down Freenet will always use bandwidth, so it will always have a performance impact for whoever happens to be using the machine. >> Uptime is really important, I'm not disputing that, but we shouldn't try to >> get it in ways that are likely to piss people off. > > Are there any such ways? Yes, running as a service. :-p Cheers, Michael
