On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > On Thursday 23 April 2009 02:40:26 j16sdiz at freenetproject.org wrote: >> Author: j16sdiz >> Date: 2009-04-23 01:40:25 +0000 (Thu, 23 Apr 2009) >> New Revision: 27218 >> >> Modified: >> ? ?trunk/contrib/fec/src/com/onionnetworks/fec/Native16Code.java >> ? ?trunk/contrib/fec/src/com/onionnetworks/fec/Native8Code.java >> ? ?trunk/contrib/fec/src/csrc/com_onionnetworks_fec_Native16Code.h >> ? ?trunk/contrib/fec/src/csrc/com_onionnetworks_fec_Native8Code.h >> ? ?trunk/contrib/fec/src/csrc/fec16-jinterf.c >> ? ?trunk/contrib/fec/src/csrc/fec8-jinterf.c >> Log: >> Use GetLongField() / SetLongField() >> > ... >> Modified: trunk/contrib/fec/src/csrc/fec8-jinterf.c >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/contrib/fec/src/csrc/fec8-jinterf.c 2009-04-23 01:40:07 UTC (rev > 27217) >> +++ trunk/contrib/fec/src/csrc/fec8-jinterf.c 2009-04-23 01:40:25 UTC (rev > 27218) > ... >> >> -/* >> - * The data[] MUST be preshuffled before this call is made or it WILL NOT >> - * WORK! ?It is very difficult to make Java aware that the pointers have >> - * been shuffled in the encode() call, so we must pre-shuffle the data >> - * so that encode doesn't move any pointers around. >> - */ > > Why delete this comment? And the one in fec16-jinterf too?
No specific reason. I was syncing fec8-jinterf.c and fec16-jinterf.c so they look identical in layout and comments.
