On Tuesday 02 June 2009 16:29:31 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some > > period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest > > of the year we are not. > > I think a progress bar would only be useful if there'd be a clear roadmap > *for > the next version* when the previous version comes out. > > "We need XY$ to be able to finish 0.8 which will include feature A, B and C. > We already have MN% of the necessary money." > > When there is no such short-term roadmap, the donation bar might not be > useful > - except as "suffices for one year" bar or similar. A buffer which shows if > freenet financing is in the green :)
IMHO the above is totally unrealistic. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090602/ff252bdd/attachment.pgp>
