Le dimanche 24 mai 2009 16:58:17, xor a ?crit : > ( > In general, currently the list of usability issues I have filed can be seen > there: > > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/roadmap_page.php > ) > > On Friday 22 May 2009 18:31:46 Cl?ment wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > First, let's see the current situation : > > > > > > #Navigation : > > > > 9 items is really the max we can afford. Currently there are 9 items, but > > they aren't all necessary, and can confuse the newbies. > > > > #Browse Freenet page : > > > > The ?Search Freenet? field and bookmarks are definitly a good thing. > > However, why do we have : > > ?Fetch a key? : we don't want to fetch a key, we want to browse Freenet. > > Fetching a key is a CORE functionality, it is like the address bar in an > internet browser! If the Freenet community is alive, it will happen very > often that people paste each others Freenet URIs via IM, email, etc. It HAS > to be easy to enter a Freenet URI. >
Well, in fact we won't get rid of the box to fetch a key from the browse freenet page. Maybe rename it like "visit a freesite (paste the freesite key)". Because there is a distinction between browsing freenet and downloading a key. So it should be on separate pages. > > ?Current Activity? : idem > > > > #Messages : > > > > I agree we need to inform user when something is wrong. However, for the > > bookmarks, it's not the good place. > > I don't think either that there should be one page just for the messages > > : sometimes there is no message, it just wastes space. > > > > > > #Connections to friends + connections to strangers : > > > > Why 2 separate pages ? Why showing informations about the current > > activity of the node ? > > Because we need the users to know very well that connections to strangers > are DANGEROUS and should be avoided. If the friend connections page is > separate, it helps having a clear overview over your friends list. > > Further, strangers are not interesting, so they should not bloat your > friends page, especially if we consider that there will be more "social > functions" on the friends page in the future. > > > #Internet Connection : > > > > ??? It doesn't even work here... And when it works, it shows debug > > informations or really advanced ones. Why a level 1 page for that ? (why > > a page for that in fact..) > > I have already filed a bug for getting rid of the internet connection page, > I really think it is bare legacy and should be removed. > > > or display a message like 'This feature is not yet available. Please use > > ?jSite / Thingamablog / > > the-other-freesite-manager-I-don't-remember-the-name? instead.' > > Possibility to add some instructions, like how to make a freesite > > available for all. > > This is a very good idea! > > > Propose to clear all the finished downloads. > > Propose to clear or stop the downloads one-by-one (as now). > > Add a checkbox to all downloads, and propose and action for the selected > > dl (like in the connection to friends page). > > "Clear all" options would be very useful, yes. Maybe with checkboxes and > some javascript to check them all. > > > Insert as : > > * CHK : explain what it is > > * SSK/USK : idem > > * KSK : idem + ask for the name > > Explanation would be a VERY good idea, consider this: > > https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=3030 > > > Don't show the opennet ref : we don't need it, do we ? > > If you want to become a seednode you need to submit it to the development > team so it gets added manually in the seednodes.fref > > - Can't we write a "crawler" mode for fred so it can automatically harvest > seednodes on opennet? Many people will have enabled seednode mode but not > submitted their reference because they do not know that they have to do it: > On most other p2p networks, you don't have to.
