> On Tuesday 14 December 2010 08:01:48 Colten Jackson wrote: > And by reading them we expose ourselves to triple damages when we implement > something similar and they sue us for patent infringement (versus > implementing the same thing having thought of it ourselves). Great idea. > What is our attitude to published literature and patents? IMHO anything > MIT publishes that is useful there is a good chance it's patented...
Can you be sued for publishing free stuff which you created yourself which violates patents? If Freenet was sold I could understand it, but I don't understand why someone could be sued for doing something for free. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101215/903e2605/attachment.pgp>
