On Wednesday 15 December 2010 21:06:46 xor wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 December 2010 08:01:48 Colten Jackson wrote:
> > And by reading them we expose ourselves to triple damages when we implement
> > something similar and they sue us for patent infringement (versus
> > implementing the same thing having thought of it ourselves). Great idea.
> > What is our attitude to published literature and patents? IMHO anything
> > MIT publishes that is useful there is a good chance it's patented...
>
> Can you be sued for publishing free stuff which you created yourself which
> violates patents?
>
> If Freenet was sold I could understand it, but I don't understand why someone
> could be sued for doing something for free.
>
Because we (FPI) are a corporation.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20101215/b010b109/attachment.pgp>
