On Wednesday 25 Jan 2012 14:47:22 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > At Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:06 -0600, > Robert Hailey wrote: > > > > > > On 2012/01/23 (Jan), at 8:21 AM, Martin 'The Bishop' Scheffler wrote: > > > > > well, i see the megaupload-bust as a second factor to that. > > > we should thank the FBI for pushing users in our direction :-) > > > > And then we should push development of freenet into freenet itself before > > the FBI comes in our direction. :-) > > I already share the freenet sources as infocalypse repository within freenet, > so taking down github will not stop freenet.
Yes but does it work? How much work, how many retries, how long, to bootstrap the repo off freenet on a fresh node? I guess this'd be an interesting performance metric ... IIRC infocalypse is fairly sophisticated so there should be relatively few lone keys that if they fail the whole repo fails... > > Best wishes, > Arne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120217/369c97bf/attachment.pgp>
