-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/05/2012 05:42 PM, Pouyan Zaxar wrote: > * What are the options? ** Wicket Native websocket (doesnt have > fallback support) ** Wicket atmosphere integration (has fallback > modes but is not the latest version of atmosphere integrated)
Are there significant disadvantages to how much the version of Atmosphere is outdated? Is my impression correct that the version of Atmosphere in Wicket has Websocket support but not have AJAX? Why do you want to use AJAX and not some other transport? Is it possible to upgrade the Atmosphere module Wicket uses manually? > ** if you think using atmosphere is better than native websocket > implementation of wicket My impression is that working with an established framework like Atmosphere could have less from-scratch work and need for low-level polish than native websockets. Why are you leaning towards native websockets? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP9jbFAAoJECLJP19KqmFuH7QQAKQqb+6mU+AcAT6+l+vZxEHe 9dj0SFtQEaCm6r9cB/ftxMzzBviSK91MEvdsQT37FgFki98pFKdIfD82tAXVz8uz s/tZIemLL9l7A7GcECxI5gsFjqXYkkQyl+yGfuk9PsDc81Q1g+BC6c+A6cVb5RDs AggMwL/1ddY0o3KfO5BDxkptBTf6Okf0w6uTuJSN3O7Ildaq7O2RH8ymeG9lZ0o+ vMc85GjINPw+SlDIkUOQilPW2PiJBf5J1QFDxuYJ82lm+xd2xgfOHjEyBYmDbZc4 1XSSyOV6eA2wNvkd4IL3hGLNQ3GzWf++K5C3ChEgG9bdX37ZTcq6Md3yVnrHq5ug XQob3PsufeULrobRbqDcz4u2gF6J2HPOHBkcgFeT1GbQOhH3ACpOXfkafrrbaw+X KikxNCjRIl7CTjsmyA4ft8DjK2SDglZQhnH5lZ92Li8TbuaZSvQ3vrLtfcwA5jCD eGBjrx0SIxjWPhcsT3zw63HKK7bGKWLHjdbWgT66mn4jIsEK/cjq8yHsdqhYAu7C tca2/CI0PCVTAypi4UaWFZaMK3bUapiUUd1Cjn49xXiGSnJkjNrW9LgYe4rmlYLq kwvi/IHpKnI0MKS6xXn/dLql5vBoM32OAAyUURxIKW/9PlAzZ6airO2EaYUDBTm8 qhbx9n1C7KfZibRetOtV =GSCe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
