+1 On 09/03/12 21:37, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Florent Daigniere > <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been doing some sysadmin tonight: >> - re-enabled ipv6 on all services >> - updated the DNS records (SPF, ...) >> - deployed a valid certificate on postfix >> >> Let me know if I broke something. >> >> I was wondering, do we have any good reason not to switch the various >> websites to HTTPS only? (with a 301 redirect on HTTP) > > Awesome, thanks! > > I'm in favor of https only. The only real arguments against it are > probably server cpu load. I assume that given our traffic levels, > that's not likely to be an issue? > > Evan Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0 https://bitbucket.org/infinity0 https://launchpad.net/~infinity0 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 900 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120309/235ad73f/attachment.pgp>
