On Friday 09 Mar 2012 21:37:12 Evan Daniel wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Florent Daigniere > <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been doing some sysadmin tonight: > > - re-enabled ipv6 on all services > > - updated the DNS records (SPF, ...) > > - deployed a valid certificate on postfix > > > > Let me know if I broke something. > > > > I was wondering, do we have any good reason not to switch the various > > websites to HTTPS only? (with a 301 redirect on HTTP) > > Awesome, thanks! > > I'm in favor of https only. The only real arguments against it are > probably server cpu load. I assume that given our traffic levels, > that's not likely to be an issue?
When we get slashdotted, our server load can be rather high. And this is a fairly low end VM we're running it off. > > Evan Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120309/306b2d60/attachment.pgp>
