Hello, I take this as a request: 1. HTLM is not a templating language 2. GWT is just a Framework, not a software architecture 3. "kick-ass design" is not a goal 4. "Code-maintainability and other software-engineering concerns are only secondary here" - definitely not agree
Some questions: 1. wysiwyg editor: Which is ? 2. "GWT doesn't allow that..." - ??? Your sources ??? An answer: 1. web design is less than 1% (of charge) of the FProxy rework, please create a static FProxy... it is an excellent and constructive action for FRProxy. The reallity: "As far as I know" here, you have the point. Rgds - Nicolas Hernandez a-n - aleph-networks *CEO* http://www.aleph-networks.com On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Florent Daigniere < nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:03:25AM -0500, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Nicolas Hernandez < > > nicolas.hernandez at aleph-networks.com> wrote: > > > > > I have send en email about that. I can fill the decision matrix for > you if > > > you really needs. > > > - Minimalist ui tools > > > - poor production capacity in iterative mode, > > > - developpers knowledge of Wicket, > > > - capacity of using multiple UI with and without js (Lnyx, Web 2.0, > > > Android, ...) > > > > > > are unfavorable compare to GWT > > > > > > > These justifications seem pragmatic. I do agree that the development > cycle > > with Wicket can be a bit slow, at least 4 years ago when I last used it. > > > > Also, you are correct not to underestimate the importance of using a > > familiar tool, it can make a huge difference in development time. > > > > Ian. > > > > They might be pragmatic but they miss the point. We want to change the > templating > engine so that 'web-designers' can use their favourite wysiwyg editor to > help us come up with a kick-ass design. Code-maintainability and other > software-engineering concerns are only secondary here... > > GWT doesn't allow that... The only wysiwyg editors I know about are within > IDEs (Eclipse and Netbeans)... That's not the tool of choice of designers. > You're still writing JAVA code as opposed to plain HTML. As far as I know, > from the list of suggested frameworks, only Wicket fulfills this > requirement. > > see: > https://wicket.apache.org/learn/examples/helloworld.html > > Florent > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120327/0ffc9bec/attachment.html>
