2007/10/9, Erin Schnabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/9/07, Jean-Vincent Drean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/10/9, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > I'd also move the Print menu inside the Page menu as "Print this page"
> >
>
> Print should be kept as print. Whether it's a "view" or not, "Print"
> makes sense to users, and a print to PDF vs. print preview is very
> natural. Changing "Print" to "Export" or "Show" only makes sense to we
> programmers.
Would agree if the print link was like all the print buttons we see
everywhere, a javascript call to the navigator print action, which is
not the case.
(disclosure : i'm -1 for having this link, don't see where it can be
useful when in the end you'll have to go to File>Print to actually
print).
> Other export could go under the "Page" menu, though I don't
> particularly like that as a menu header.. "Page Actions" or just
> "Actions". I know the "More Actions" was a hodge-podge, but it was a
> nice hodge-podge, and a lot of users found that pretty obvious to use.
> I called the "More Actions" hodge-podge "Admin" in my new skin
> because it was more "Admin-ish" kinds of actions, where the
> edit/show/add/print actions were classified appropriately.
Hope this thread won't end up in a hodge-podge VS. anti-hodge-podge fight :)
I still hope we can find a solution to avoid a hodge-podge in the action menu.
(but if we have to have one I'd call it "Actions")
> Also, having rename and delete under "Admin" kept them in an intuitive
> location, while at the same time making it less likely that they would
> be accidentally clicked.
Reminder : it'd be great if we can all forget about having an Admin
entry in the action menu, we'll see that later.
> If it becomes a "Page Actions" ("Page" by itself just seems wrong, but
> I don't like "Page Actions" either), then having Copy, Rename, Delete,
> and Access rights all under that make sense.
Yep, if it becomes a "Page Actions".
> I don't think "Watch this space" or "Watch this page" need to be
> anywhere in particular. Most of the modern browsers find any RSS feed
> links on the page w/o intervention, and I've always found that a more
> obvious link (in a panel, for example) is more effective than tucking
> the "Watch" URL's in one of those menus.. Unless "Watch" means
> something other than I think it does.
The watch feature isn't about RSS, it's about building a list of pages
you want to watch and receive notifications about (both email & RSS),
I'll write about that later.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
