Well... maybe in place of using the actual withVersions I can add a
new one lets say... withVersionInfos that also force withVersions to
false false when withVersionInfos=false.

WDYT ?

2007/10/12, Jean-Vincent Drean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2007/10/12, Erin Schnabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > WAIT WAIT WAIT...
> >
> > We already went through this. When I export a document (say an
> > application), I want to be able to export it without the version
> > history, but with other attributes preserved!!
>
> I'd be curious to know in which use case, could you explain it ?
>
> > Perhaps it could be combined with the preserveVersion flag?
> >
> > If withVersions is false and preserveVersion is false then clear those 
> > fields,
> > if withVersions is false, and preserveVersion is true then leave the
> > fields alone,
> > if withVersions is true, leave the fields alone
>
> If this is going to be implemented I'd be +1 to rename preserveVersion
> to preserveAttributes or withAttributes since the current names are
> confusing.
>
> JV.
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>


-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to