At least I revert the change for 1.1 as it's not really a bug or a really string need (even if app manager is based on 1.1 and will benefit of this modification), we'll see for 1.2.
2007/10/12, Thomas Mortagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well... maybe in place of using the actual withVersions I can add a > new one lets say... withVersionInfos that also force withVersions to > false false when withVersionInfos=false. > > WDYT ? > > 2007/10/12, Jean-Vincent Drean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 2007/10/12, Erin Schnabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > WAIT WAIT WAIT... > > > > > > We already went through this. When I export a document (say an > > > application), I want to be able to export it without the version > > > history, but with other attributes preserved!! > > > > I'd be curious to know in which use case, could you explain it ? > > > > > Perhaps it could be combined with the preserveVersion flag? > > > > > > If withVersions is false and preserveVersion is false then clear those > > > fields, > > > if withVersions is false, and preserveVersion is true then leave the > > > fields alone, > > > if withVersions is true, leave the fields alone > > > > If this is going to be implemented I'd be +1 to rename preserveVersion > > to preserveAttributes or withAttributes since the current names are > > confusing. > > > > JV. > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
