Hi Vincent,

Came back from home just yesterday, what is the status of releasing XEclipse
?

My final semester started from today. I might not be able to contribute a
lot during this period, but I will keep in touch for sure.

Thanks.

- Asiri

On 10/18/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
>
> >
> > On Oct 15, 2007, at 6:25 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The XEclipse 1.0M2 release was supposed to be done on the 8th of
> >> October but since I was on a trip I wasn't able to do it.
> >>
> >> We need to replan its release.
> >>
> >> Since Fabio has started working on it I'd like to know when we can
> >> release it?
> >>
> > I did a bit of "high level" refactoring on XEclipse that only touched
> > the surface (already committed).
> >
> > I didn't go deeper because I would have broken the current build and
> > I think that low level changes are quite difficult to accommodate in
> > the current XEclipse structure.
> >
> > In particular the caching logic should be revised because this is a
> > very sensible feature for the product and it should be as clean and
> > maintainable as possible and, of course, well tested. I am spending
> > some time on it trying factor it out as a separate component and I'll
> > post a version to be peer-reviewed soon.
>
> ok cool.
>
> > There are some other things to be revised and, as I wrote in a
> > previous email, they are basically features that are not written
> > having in mind the "Eclipse-way" of doing things. But these are minor
> > changes and some of them have already been done.
> >
> > So, to return to the release date issue, we could release XEclipse
> > 1.0M2 as it is now, and plan another release with the all the
> > refactorings in 2 weeks  (let's say monday 29)
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> +1, let's do it. I need to try the new conflict warning feature
> though. Has anyone verified it works?
>
> Ping me on irc when you're ready to release XEclipse 1.0M2.
>
> >> Fabio, would you be interested in being the Release Manager for
> >> XEclipse and in doing the release of XEclipse 1.0M2 (I can explain to
> >> you how to do it)?
> >>
> > Yes, I would be glad to do it!
>
> cooool :)
>
> > As a side note: we should spend some time trying to figure out how to
> > integrate maven with PDE builds. Currently XEclipse is built as a
> > single plugin and this could not be enough. If we want to build it
> > (also) as a standalone RCP application (as the one I gave to some of
> > you), possibly made of different plugins (e.g., xeclipse.core,
> > xeclipse.ui) with a reference target platform that should also be
> > made available through the maven repository to developers, we will
> > need to fiddle a little bit with all of this because, as you already
> > know, maven and PDE are not very good friends :(
>
> I've used the maven PDE plugin from
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/pde-maven-plugin/
>
> I think it supports plugins, features and products. See
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/pde-maven-plugin/examples/simple_product.html
>
> Is a "product" the same as an RCP application?
>
> Do you think you could work on modifying the maven build so that we
> can release both an RCP application and a plugin?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs@xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to