+1 Vincent Massol wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to standardize on package naming. I've > seen Jerome's commit for the new invitation manager plugin and this > prompted me to send this email. > > I propose the following: > > * org.xwiki.<module name>.* : user public APIs > * org.xwiki.<module name>.internal.* : non user public classes > > - This means no "impl" package (which IMO doesn't mean much since it > doesn't say if it's public or not). > - This also means no "api" package (which IMO is not necessary since > it should be the default and makes it more complex to use). > - I also don't think we need a "spi" package since we have components. > > I'm also proposing to generally follow the rules defined here: > http://www.eclipse.org/articles/article.php?file=Article-API-Use/index.html > (see also http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/participating/apis.html) > > Here's my +1
-- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
