+1 On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think it would be a good idea to standardize on package naming. I've > seen Jerome's commit for the new invitation manager plugin and this > prompted me to send this email. > > I propose the following: > > * org.xwiki.<module name>.* : user public APIs > * org.xwiki.<module name>.internal.* : non user public classes > > - This means no "impl" package (which IMO doesn't mean much since it > doesn't say if it's public or not). > - This also means no "api" package (which IMO is not necessary since > it should be the default and makes it more complex to use). > - I also don't think we need a "spi" package since we have components. > > I'm also proposing to generally follow the rules defined here: > http://www.eclipse.org/articles/article.php?file=Article-API-Use/index.html > (see also http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/participating/apis.html) > > Here's my +1 > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
