> > On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > >>> Hi Marius, >>> >>> Just to let you know that it seems the editor you've committed on >>> last >>> Friday doesn't use an updated version of the XWiki syntax and is thus >>> out of sync with the renderer. For example: >> >> The WYSIWYG editor doesn't use internally the XWiki syntax. It has >> HTML as >> input and outputs also HTML. The conversion to and from XWiki syntax >> is >> done here: http://tinyurl.com/5mwjq6 . So as long as >> xwiki-core-rendering-1.6*.jar is in the class path it must be the >> latest >> version of the renderer that it is used to make the conversion. > > Ok then it means I was looking at code that uses the old rendering I > guess. Should we keep this code? Or did we all agree to drop it and > focus on the new rendering only? (I think that's what we agreed on). > > If that's the case then we should clean the code and remove the > support for the old renderer I guess. > > WDYT?
Right. Monday morning the Radeox-based XHTMLConverter will be dropped. I will also refactor my XxxImpl classes to DefaultXxx to meet the naming conventions. Thanks, Marius > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> >> >> If you look at XWikiXHTMLConverter#fromXHTML method, the XWiki >> syntax is >> not specified. I suspect it gets defaulted to version 1.0. >> >>> * Bold is **bold**, not *bold* >>> * Macros use 2 curly braces >>> * etc >>> >>> We need to fix this ASAP since otherwise it won't work and we need to >>> release a working version for 1.6M1 (not everything should work but >>> easy stuff like this should work). >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
