On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > Vincent Massol wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to clarify the strategy I'd like to propose that we use for >> JIRA fix for values since we haven't been very consistent about this >> in the past. >> >> Proposed rules: >> >> * We put all "fix for" for all places the commits have been done. If >> the commit has been done on 3 locations then we need 3 fix for >> values. >> For ex right now if you commit on trunk + in 1.8 branch you need fix >> for for *both* 1.8RC2 and 1.9M1. > > I'm already doing this, so +1 > >> * In the release notes on xwiki.org we only put issues that haven't >> been already released in past versions. So when 1.9 M1 release notes >> are written you should exclude 1.8RC2 issues since they would have >> been released already (1.8RC2 is planned before 1.9M1). > > What about 1.8.1 (or any other bug-fix release) and 1.9M1 (a > development > release)?
If 1.8.1 arrives before 1.9M1 then no problem. The release notes for 1.9M1 will have a section named "Changes since 1.8.1". If 1.8.1 arrives after 1.9M1 then the 1.8.1 release notes will have a section named "Changes since 1.8". Is that what you meant? > In this case the two versions are somehow independent so I > guess we should keep the fixed issues in both release notes. Thanks -Vincent > >> WDYT? >> >> If we agree can everyone check his jira issues and correct the fix >> for >> values? >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> http://xwiki.com >> http://xwiki.org >> http://massol.net >> _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
