Vincent Massol wrote: > On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > >> Hi Vincent, >> >> Vincent Massol wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to clarify the strategy I'd like to propose that we use for >>> JIRA fix for values since we haven't been very consistent about this >>> in the past. >>> >>> Proposed rules: >>> >>> * We put all "fix for" for all places the commits have been done. If >>> the commit has been done on 3 locations then we need 3 fix for >>> values. >>> For ex right now if you commit on trunk + in 1.8 branch you need fix >>> for for *both* 1.8RC2 and 1.9M1. >> I'm already doing this, so +1 >> >>> * In the release notes on xwiki.org we only put issues that haven't >>> been already released in past versions. So when 1.9 M1 release notes >>> are written you should exclude 1.8RC2 issues since they would have >>> been released already (1.8RC2 is planned before 1.9M1). >> What about 1.8.1 (or any other bug-fix release) and 1.9M1 (a >> development >> release)? > > If 1.8.1 arrives before 1.9M1 then no problem. The release notes for > 1.9M1 will have a section named "Changes since 1.8.1". > If 1.8.1 arrives after 1.9M1 then the 1.8.1 release notes will have a > section named "Changes since 1.8". > > Is that what you meant?
Yes. +1 Thanks, Marius > >> In this case the two versions are somehow independent so I >> guess we should keep the fixed issues in both release notes. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > >>> WDYT? >>> >>> If we agree can everyone check his jira issues and correct the fix >>> for >>> values? >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> http://xwiki.com >>> http://xwiki.org >>> http://massol.net >>> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
