On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Vincent Massol > >>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Pascal, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> -Vincent > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Ok I see! > >>>>> And has anyone tried to hook the text renderer or at least chosen > >>>>> the URL? > >>>>> :) > >>>>> (?xpage=text) > >>>>> (?xpage=plaintext) > >>>>> or simply replace (?xpage=plain) > >>>> > >>>> see http://markmail.org/thread/bao6nn5qgmo7w45j > >>>> > >>> > >>> It is quite strange to speak with someone quoting Jira :) > >> > >> That was a mail thread, not jira. I'm sorry but I don't have the time > >> to copy paste all past discussions just for your pleasure or not > >> having to read an email thread... ;) > >> > > > > Really sorry about that but I'm also in a hurry looking at several > > things at > > the same time and I just thought I was still in JIRA without looking > > at the > > mail thread behind...For my (p)leasure, I will read it because it > > seems to > > answer my question... > > > > > >> > >>> Ok Mr. Jira and do you confirm that nobody coded this part which > >>> routes the > >>> renderer to the plain text renderer when syntax is 2.0? > >> > >> Hmm... why don't you look at the jira issue? There's a field named > >> "status" which shows if the issue has been implemented or not... > >> Hint: it says "open". So yes it's not been done... > >> > > > > I can see that but this status doesn't mean that anybody has never > > tried to > > code it... > > but you're a bad guy making me a fool like that because you've just > > modified > > the JIRA in the meantime to add the mail thread in case anybody > > thought I > > was not silly enough :):):):) > > No I did that before you answered just because I noticed that the > thread was not referenced from the jira issue. > > I'm not a bad guy, unless you consider that the following is bad: > - trying to help you > - answering quickly to your questions > - answering even though you didn't search the mail archives before > asking > > ;) > ok i give up, you are too strong :) I'm just a fool because I was searching in xwiki.org about it and not in the mails:) Ok joking is enough :) When somebody knowing it will have time, it would be fine to put in a small page in xwiki.org the different options for xpage and the behavior between xwiki/1.0 and 2.0... might be useful... The same for the jsfx module (one can find some little info about jsx or ssx but not jsfx or the search engine doesn't index it well) This is not a critic because I know how difficult it is to keep doc alive... but for new modules like that, just a small page giving the role and the options would be useful... thanks anyway Pascal > > [snip] > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
