On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Vincent Massol >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Pascal Voitot wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Vincent Massol >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Pascal, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3413 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok I see! >>>>>>> And has anyone tried to hook the text renderer or at least >>>>>>> chosen >>>>>>> the URL? >>>>>>> :) >>>>>>> (?xpage=text) >>>>>>> (?xpage=plaintext) >>>>>>> or simply replace (?xpage=plain) >>>>>> >>>>>> see http://markmail.org/thread/bao6nn5qgmo7w45j >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is quite strange to speak with someone quoting Jira :) >>>> >>>> That was a mail thread, not jira. I'm sorry but I don't have the >>>> time >>>> to copy paste all past discussions just for your pleasure or not >>>> having to read an email thread... ;) >>>> >>> >>> Really sorry about that but I'm also in a hurry looking at several >>> things at >>> the same time and I just thought I was still in JIRA without looking >>> at the >>> mail thread behind...For my (p)leasure, I will read it because it >>> seems to >>> answer my question... >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> Ok Mr. Jira and do you confirm that nobody coded this part which >>>>> routes the >>>>> renderer to the plain text renderer when syntax is 2.0? >>>> >>>> Hmm... why don't you look at the jira issue? There's a field named >>>> "status" which shows if the issue has been implemented or not... >>>> Hint: it says "open". So yes it's not been done... >>>> >>> >>> I can see that but this status doesn't mean that anybody has never >>> tried to >>> code it... >>> but you're a bad guy making me a fool like that because you've just >>> modified >>> the JIRA in the meantime to add the mail thread in case anybody >>> thought I >>> was not silly enough :):):):) >> >> No I did that before you answered just because I noticed that the >> thread was not referenced from the jira issue. >> >> I'm not a bad guy, unless you consider that the following is bad: >> - trying to help you >> - answering quickly to your questions >> - answering even though you didn't search the mail archives before >> asking >> >> ;) >> > > ok i give up, you are too strong :) > I'm just a fool because I was searching in xwiki.org about it and > not in the > mails:)
yes aggregating emails in the wiki to offer a common search UI would be great... > Ok joking is enough :) > When somebody knowing it will have time, it would be fine to put in > a small > page in xwiki.org the different options for xpage and the behavior > between > xwiki/1.0 and 2.0... might be useful... > The same for the jsfx module (one can find some little info about > jsx or ssx > but not jsfx or the search engine doesn't index it well) > This is not a critic because I know how difficult it is to keep doc > alive... > but for new modules like that, just a small page giving the role and > the > options would be useful... yes definitely. Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
