Hi! Pascal Voitot wrote: > the wysiwyg should only be a helper allowing to access some features more > easily but we need to keep the deep customization features (the XWiki > wysiwyg editor is an example of that... you can write with it but when you > need to have a more precise view, you go in the classical editor) I agree with that! But I think this was not true with the old XWiki wiki editor: switching between wiki and WYSIWYG editors results in losses and/or changes in the format and, as far as I can remember, even contents (changes in code that result in changes in displayed content). I guess this is not longer true with the new WYSIWYG included with 2.x. We are looking for enjoying it. > for sure, this wouldn't be a problem ;)... > Imagine you have a project with a quotation of 1.000.000 mendays... you find > 1.000.000 people and in 1 day, you have your solution :) > Wait! We must change a concept here! We can not use man-day. We could use person-day or people-days! My wife is involved in genre equality policies and teaches me on this issues.
Greetings! Ricardo -- Ricardo RodrÃguez Your EPEC Network ICT Team _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
