On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:01 PM, [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT
Team <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Pascal Voitot wrote:
> > the wysiwyg should only be a helper allowing to access some features more
> > easily but we need to keep the deep customization features (the XWiki
> > wysiwyg editor is an example of that... you can write with it but when
> you
> > need to have a more precise view, you go in the classical editor)
> I agree with that! But I think this was not true with the old XWiki wiki
> editor: switching between wiki and WYSIWYG editors results in losses
> and/or changes in the format and, as far as I can remember, even
> contents (changes in code that result in changes in displayed content).
> I guess this is not longer true with the new WYSIWYG included with 2.x.
> We are looking for enjoying it.


you're right, the new GWT editor is really greater than the previous editor!
still some small bugs but really better!


>
> > for sure, this wouldn't be a problem ;)...
> > Imagine you have a project with a quotation of 1.000.000 mendays... you
> find
> > 1.000.000 people and in 1 day, you have your solution :)
> >
> Wait! We must change a concept here! We can not use man-day. We could
> use person-day or people-days! My wife is involved in genre equality
> policies and teaches me on this issues.
>

You would be right in a humanistic world but in ours, companies policies
more and more teach me to speak about "cattle-days" :):)... and tell to your
wife not to care about equality because women or men are quite equal with
respect to this way of thinking: you're just a resource with a cost, nothing
less, nothing more ;)



>
> Greetings!
>
> Ricardo
>
> --
> Ricardo Rodríguez
> Your EPEC Network ICT Team
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to