Hi,

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Anca Paula Luca
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Anca Paula Luca wrote:
> > Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> A bit of summarizing on what we've got so far:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Ecaterina Valica <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> * 1.*
> >>>
> >>>
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterfaceAppendix#HModalboxtitles
> >>>  +1 for A with a left-aligned title (keep the consistency with the left
> >>> alignerd forms)
> >>
> >> Pretty much everyone agreed on left-aligned title.
> >>
> >> *2. *
> >>>
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterfaceAppendix#HMarkerformandatoryformfieldsinmodalboxes
> >>> +1 F, G, H with modifications:
> >>> F - * need somewhere to be stated that * means Required
> >>>   - the location of the star changes the position with the length of
> the
> >>> label
> >>>
> >>> G - from a visual scanning point of view, it's better that they are at
> the
> >>> beginning of the line and the stars are not changing their position
> >>>   - but the star should be outside the alignment of the text
> >>>   - also somewhere needs o be stated the meaning of the star
> >>>
> >>> H - is the most straight forward
> >>>   - Required should have another color than the explanatory text ("Type
> the
> >>> address...") so it pops out
> >
> > I used the same color & style for "required" as for the explanatory text
> because
> > it's the same type of information, explanations for the field. The
> position next
> > to the field label is supposed to distinguish it from the rest of the
> explanation.
> >
> >>> I agree with Sergiu that green is not the best color for required
> fields.
> >>> Also it has low contrast with black and white.
> >>>
> >> Proposal H got the most vote. I agree with Caty on the fact that make it
> >> colored would pop out more. As long as it's a dark enough color I think
> it
> >> won't hinder accessibility.
> >>
> >> Thus I'm suggesting we use H but with "required" printed in the orange
> color
> >> used in proposal G.
>
> I added prototype I to illustrate this. The orange used is the "wiki
> standard
> colors" orange (which could, of course be grayed a bit to match the other
> labels).
>
> >
> > dark enough color is not compatible with that orange flavour :) . I can
> do a
> > prototype but I think it will be a lot too much (since it's more than
> just a
> > sign, it's a full word orange).
> >
> > how about H as is? (compatible with the link you gave me to
> >
> http://www.cxpartners.co.uk/thoughts/web_forms_design_guidelines_an_eyetracking_study.htm
> > guideline 5 where normal colors are used).
> >
> >> WDYT?
>

I like I and the fact that it pops out a bit more (which is the point of the
required sign, make it obvious that those 2 fields have to be filled). I'll
be ok with H if nobody else likes it though.


> >> 3.
> >>>
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterfaceAppendix#HErrorreporting
> >>> +1 C1 because is a separation between the explanatory text and the
> error
> >>> text. Putting it below makes sense for me to have this separation. The
> red
> >>> color is ok.
> >>>
> >>> I don't like the green of the labels for the mandatory fields. Too many
> >>> colors and means nothing for me that the fields are green.
> >>
> >> B got 3 votes, A one, C one. B & C are quite similar (text above or
> below
> >> the error). Having text at the top is better in the tree configuration
> and
> >> it doesn't make that much of a difference for regular fields.
> >>
> >> Thus I suggest we go for B.
> >
> > Since Marius' vote for A was based on the fact that too much red is scary
> (and I
> > agree users fear errors), but a red-bordered field is useful to better
> associate
> >   the error with the field, I'd go for a lighter red (compatible with the
> grey
> > labels). I'll do a prototype asap. WDYT?
>
> That would be prototype E.


I like it.

Guillaume

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anca
> >
> >> We're short on time here, please cast your -1 quickly if you disagree
> with
> >> this.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Guillaume
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> devs mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to