On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
>
>
> That was also my initial opinion. What would actually happen is that
> the
> "Next" button would disappear when at the last step of the form ;-)
>
> The drawback with that approach is that the user doesn't know
> whether doing
> an action (selecting a link for instance) will "un-disable" a button
> or not
> -> some buttons will get enabled (say, "next") while others won't
> ("finish").
>
> In practice there's indeed a "blinking" risk, we might be aiming at
> the best
> while the good would be enough (yes, that's a rough translation of a
> French
> saying).
>
I misunderstood. I though that buttons were disappearing and appearing
in the _same_ form.
What you are proposing, if I am not wrong again, is that each form has
a different set of buttons that depends on the
actual actions that are possible at that point (though some of them
could be temporarily disabled).
Ok. I don't have a strong opinion but I think it could be ok.
Sorry for the noise :)
-Fabio
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
